A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, seek out to develop their family members house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to stringent controls under European and Irish environmental law. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in a very delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially built, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their look at, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both equally extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact develop into emblematic in the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times reported, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the drinking water in the course of extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental protection and adherence to organizing law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting in its place that it's about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they may have explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just looking to establish a household dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely out depending on Qualified advice and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a circumstance that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily truth of your coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Are living together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.